Social media would later explode with accusations, theories, and moral outrage once the story leaked beyond the penthouse walls.
Some blamed medical negligence, others accused Richard of willful denial, and a darker group whispered about control and psychological imprisonment.
Was it possible that wealth had insulated Richard from accountability rather than protecting his daughter?
Could unlimited money actually prevent truth from surfacing by silencing doubt instead of encouraging it?
Experts debated whether prolonged misdiagnosis could psychologically induce blindness-like behavior in a developing child.
Ethicists questioned how authority figures shape identity when children are taught limitations they never truly had.
Parents worldwide reacted emotionally, imagining the horror of unknowingly limiting their own children’s potential.
The most disturbing question, however, remained unanswered and deeply controversial.
If Luna could see, even partially, who benefited from her blindness?
Some argued Richard gained sympathy, public admiration, and moral branding as a tragic hero billionaire.
Others insisted he was simply a victim of grief, trapped by trust in institutions designed to protect, not deceive.
Julia became both a hero and a target overnight, praised for her courage and attacked for challenging professional authority.
